Importance Score: 25 / 100 🔵
Motorola Moto G Power (2025): A Budget-Friendly Smartphone Review
The $300 Moto G Power emerges as the most recommendable budget smartphone from Motorola’s 2025 series. In extended use, this Motorola phone consistently delivered a smooth user experience for everyday tasks. For loyal Motorola consumers or those seeking an affordable device, the Moto G Power is a strong contender, adeptly managing essential functions without straining your finances.
Enhanced Performance and Multitasking
While it might not be perceived as exceptional praise, the improved performance of the Moto G Power compared to the more basic Moto G is significant. That extra investment translates to noticeably superior functionality. The Moto G Power offers enhanced processing capabilities, enabling seamless multitasking, fluid video conferencing, competent gaming at lower graphical settings, and capturing satisfactory images of subjects ranging from food photography in bright conditions to concert snapshots in dimmer environments.
Impressive Battery and Charging Capabilities
Charging efficiency stands out as a key advantage. In battery tests, the Moto G Power charged from zero to 61% using the included 30W wired charger, slightly surpassing the charging speed of its predecessor. Furthermore, it incorporates 15W wireless charging. For those intending to utilize magnetic Qi2 chargers, a third-party case, typical for many Android devices, will be necessary.
Display and Visual Experience
The inclusion of rapid charging proves particularly beneficial given the Power’s expansive 6.8-inch, 1,080p display featuring a 120Hz refresh rate. This high refresh rate display, while excellent for fluid scrolling and video playback, can potentially increase battery consumption during demanding usage. The large screen facilitates enjoyable video streaming, texting, and casual gaming. However, in terms of vibrant, HDR-like colors, it doesn’t quite match competitors in the $300 price bracket, such as the OnePlus Nord N30. This represents a reasonable compromise considering the phone’s affordability.
Benchmark Performance Analysis
In benchmark evaluations, including the graphically intensive 3DMark Wild Life Extreme and the computationally focused Geekbench 6.0 tests, the phone’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor demonstrated marginally better performance than the standard $200 Moto G, which utilizes the same chipset.

vCard.red is a free platform for creating a mobile-friendly digital business cards. You can easily create a vCard and generate a QR code for it, allowing others to scan and save your contact details instantly.
The platform allows you to display contact information, social media links, services, and products all in one shareable link. Optional features include appointment scheduling, WhatsApp-based storefronts, media galleries, and custom design options.
Moto G Power vs. Moto G Benchmarks
Geekbench 6.0 | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 30 min. fast charging test (charging speed/result) | YouTube streaming drain test starting at 100% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Moto G Power (2025) | Single: 793; Multi: 2,086 | 384; 2.3fps | 30W: 0% to 61% | 1 hr: 93%; 2 hr: 85%; 3 hr: 75% (120Hz) |
Moto G (2025) | Single: 784; Multi: 1,970 | 384; 2.3fps | 30W; 0% to 51% | 1 hr: 92%; 2 hr: 84%; 3 hr: 76% (120Hz) |
Everyday Use and Memory
Outside of demanding gaming, the Moto G Power operated without issues in daily usage. Routine activities such as YouTube viewing, web browsing, and video calls were handled smoothly. While the device experienced slight frame rate drops in Marvel Snap at medium settings, its 8GB of RAM—double that of the Moto G—likely contributes to its more efficient performance in typical use. This contrasts sharply with the Moto G, which required Motorola’s RAM boost feature (virtual memory) to achieve acceptable usability. The Power functions effectively using its default “AI” mode for memory management.
Camera Performance: Still Photography
The Moto G Power features a dual rear camera system, comprising a 50-megapixel primary lens and an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, along with a 16-megapixel front-facing camera. Image capture through both camera setups records the essential elements of photos, though they tend to lack nuanced detail.
Example: Food Photography
For example, a close-up shot of macaroni and cheese photographed outdoors adequately depicts the dish. However, finer textures of the cheesy sauce and breadcrumb topping are not distinctly rendered. The background surrounding the subject also exhibits noticeable blur.
Low-Light Photography and Concerts
During a Kylie Minogue concert at Madison Square Garden, from a rear seating position, the phone managed to capture some discernible details of the singer and dancers. This type of challenging low-light, long-distance photography often poses difficulties for even premium smartphones, making the Moto G Power’s performance in this scenario commendable—avoiding a completely blurred result.
Selfie Camera Capabilities
The front camera’s performance also surpassed expectations in selfie capture. Utilizing the selfie light—visibly reflected in glasses glare—the majority of the face and clothing appears sharp in the resulting photo. While hair detail blends into the darker background, and some image noise is present, these are demanding conditions even for phones in higher price brackets. Therefore, for a $300 device, the selfie camera performance is noteworthy.
Video Recording
The cameras are capable of capturing 1080p video at 30fps. This resolution proved sufficient for recording footage at an Anberlin concert. However, similar to still photos, captured video footage lacked significant detail. It serves adequately for quick memory preservation but is not ideal for playback on larger screens like TVs.
Durability and Software Support
While not tested under full submersion, the Moto G Power’s IP68 and IP69 ratings suggest robust water and dust resistance, implying resilience against accidental drops into sinks or pools. However, despite its durable build, a key drawback is Motorola’s limited software and security update timeline. The device is slated to receive only two years of major Android OS updates and three years of security patches. While yet to evaluate Samsung’s new Galaxy A series, a major competitor, Samsung offers a contrasting commitment of six years of software and security support. This difference in policy is a point Motorola should reconsider, particularly as the Moto G line could become an increasingly attractive option for budget-conscious buyers concerned about potential electronics price increases due to tariffs.
Conclusion: Value Proposition
Provided users maintain realistic expectations regarding its three-year lifespan, the Moto G Power presents itself as a viable choice for individuals needing a fundamental smartphone without unnecessary premium features.
Motorola Moto G Power (2025) vs. Motorola Moto G (2025) vs. Samsung Galaxy A26 5G Specifications Comparison
Moto G Power 2025 | Moto G 2025 | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
---|---|---|---|
Display size, resolution | 6.8-inch LCD display; 2,388×1,080 pixels; 120Hz refresh rate | 6.7-inch LCD; 1,604×720 pixels; 120Hz refresh rate | 6.7-inch AMOLED; 2,340 x 1,080 pixels; 120Hz refresh rate |
Pixel density | 387 ppi | 263ppi | 385 ppi |
Dimensions (inches) | 6.57 x 3.03 x 0.34 in | 6.57x3x0.32 in. | 6.46 x 3.05 x 0.3 in |
Dimensions (millimeters) | 167 x 77 x 8.7 mm | 167.05×76.3×8.16mm | 164 x 77.5 x 7.7 mm |
Weight (ounces, grams) | 208g (7.34 oz) | 193g | 200g (7.05 oz.) |
Mobile software | Android 15 | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Camera | 50-megapixel (wide), 8-megapixel (ultrawide) | 50-megapixel (wide), 2-megapixel (macro) | 50-megapixel (wide), 8-megapixel (ultrawide), 2-megapixel (macro) |
Front-facing camera | 16-megapixel | 16-megapixel | 13-megapixel |
Video capture | 1080p at 30fps | 720p at 30fps | TBD |
Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Exynos 1380 |
RAM/Storage | 8GB + 128GB | 4GB + 128GB | 6GB + 128GB |
Expandable storage | Yes | Yes, microSD | None |
Battery/Charger | 5,000 mAh | 5,000mAh | 5,000mAh |
Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side | Side |
Connector | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
Headphone jack | Yes | Yes | None |
Special features | 30W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, IP68 and IP69 water resistance, MIL-STD 810H certification, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, 2 years of software updates, 3 years of security updates, Moto Gestures, RAM Boost | 30W wired charging, water-repellent design (IP52), Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, 2 years of software updates, 3 years of security updates, Moto Gestures, RAM Boost | Galaxy AI, OneUI 7, Circle To Search, Object Eraser, 6 generations of Andoid OS, 6 years of softawre & security support, IP67 water & dust resistance, 10-bit HDR recording |
Price off-contract (USD) | $300 | $200 (4GB + 128GB) | $300 (128GB) |
Price (GBP) | N/A | N/A | Converts to £240 |
Price (AUD) | N/A | N/A | Converts to AU$485 |
Phone Testing Methodology
Real-World Usage and Feature Evaluation
Every phone assessed by FASTNET’s reviews team undergoes practical, real-world testing. This encompasses evaluating phone features, gaming performance, and photographic capabilities. Displays are scrutinized for brightness, clarity, and vibrancy. Design and build are examined for ergonomics and water resistance (IP rating). Processor performance is pushed through standardized benchmarks like GeekBench and 3DMark, alongside subjective assessments of interface navigation, high-resolution video recording, and graphically intensive gaming at high refresh rates.
Camera Testing Across Diverse Conditions
Camera systems are rigorously tested in varied lighting environments, from bright sunlight to dimly lit indoor settings. Special camera modes like night mode and portrait mode are evaluated, and findings are contrasted with similarly priced competing smartphones. Battery life is assessed via daily use simulations and a series of battery drain tests.
Comprehensive Feature Consideration and Value Assessment
Additional features, including 5G support, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and facial recognition, stylus compatibility, fast charging, and foldable screens, are considered for their utility. All testing elements are weighed against the phone’s price to determine its overall value proposition. While not all tests may feature in initial reviews, follow-up and long-term testing are generally conducted.