This ‘Poo Zoo’ is harvesting living cells from animal dung

Importance Score: 55 / 100 🔵

Wildlife conservation efforts are increasingly crucial as biodiversity faces rapid decline. Scientists are exploring innovative methods to monitor and protect animal populations, and a pioneering approach involves analyzing animal feces. Professor Suzannah Williams, from Oxford University, leads a team investigating how analyzing animal dung can provide valuable genetic information. This non-invasive technique, dubbed the “Poo Zoo,” could revolutionize how researchers study wildlife genetic diversity and contribute to biobanking for endangered species.

Unlocking Conservation Secrets Through Fecal Analysis

Biodiversity is under severe threat, with wildlife populations experiencing an alarming average decrease of 73% between 1970 and 2020. Professor Williams and her team at Oxford University believe that animal excrement holds vital clues for conservationists. Analyzing animal feces can offer insights into wildlife populations, potentially aiding in their monitoring and even the revitalization of dwindling numbers.

According to Williams, a specialist in fertility and reproductive health, defecation naturally results in the shedding of living cells from the animal’s intestines. These cells, crucially, are present on the exterior of the dung.

These living cells are a rich source of DNA and genetic information. Researchers can utilize this information to assess species diversity, potentially informing breeding programs and broader conservation strategies.

Traditional methods of obtaining tissue samples from wild animals are invasive and challenging. Capturing and anesthetizing animals for procedures like skin biopsies is not only time-consuming but also induces stress in the animals, Williams explains. Furthermore, stringent regulations in regions like the UK and Europe limit tissue sampling unless directly beneficial to the individual animal’s health. This regulatory landscape complicates the large-scale collection of genetic diversity data, notes Williams.

vCard QR Code

vCard.red is a free platform for creating a mobile-friendly digital business cards. You can easily create a vCard and generate a QR code for it, allowing others to scan and save your contact details instantly.

The platform allows you to display contact information, social media links, services, and products all in one shareable link. Optional features include appointment scheduling, WhatsApp-based storefronts, media galleries, and custom design options.

The “Poo Zoo” Initiative

These challenges led to the inception of the “Poo Zoo” in October 2024, funded by the conservation organization Revive and Restore. This project builds upon prior Japanese research demonstrating the isolation of living cells from mouse stools. However, Williams notes that the cells obtained in the earlier study were of suboptimal quality and contaminated with fecal bacteria.

By refining and optimizing cell isolation techniques, Williams aims to enhance cell quality and provide conservationists with a non-invasive method for acquiring living cell samples. This could significantly contribute to biobanking and the establishment of genetic material repositories, which are invaluable for assisted reproductive technologies like IVF, particularly for elusive and endangered species.

“While fecal samples may not surpass tissue samples in quality, accessing remote or endangered animals poses significant hurdles,” Williams states. “Locating animal defecation sites allows for sample collection using camera traps, providing access to samples from species otherwise inaccessible.”

Navigating the Challenges of Elephant Dung

The research commenced with mouse feces, readily available at the university lab. The team experimented with various dilution and straining methods to purify cells as quickly as possible, maintaining sample freshness.

Having refined their methodology with mice, the Poo Zoo team tackled a more formidable challenge: elephant dung. Elephants, often central to conservation initiatives, presented unique logistical complexities due to their size.

“Mouse droppings are small, dry pellets, whereas elephant dung is an immense mass,” Williams elaborates. “Handling such large quantities and extracting cells for analysis without creating an unmanageable volume of liquid presented a significant problem.”

Dr. Rhiannon Bolton, a biobanking researcher, undertook this challenge in collaboration with Chester Zoo, which granted access to fresh elephant feces.

Bolton notes that Chester Zoo extensively utilizes fecal analysis to assess animal health, monitoring hormones and pregnancy status.

Refining the technique, which remains confidential prior to peer-reviewed publication, involved substantial experimentation. Bolton describes it as “very much trial and error,” encompassing approaches from washing the entire mass to taking minute external scrapings.

Bolton adds, “Initially, samples contained considerable debris; however, we have significantly reduced contamination.”

Other non-invasive sampling techniques exist, such as hair traps utilizing pheromones to attract animals and adhesives to collect hair. While hair samples have been used for mammal population studies, Bolton indicates that feces provide a more abundant and reliable source of cells, less susceptible to environmental degradation.

“Our novel protocols are simple, cost-effective, and readily scalable for widespread implementation,” Bolton asserts.

The team has repeatedly achieved successful isolation of living elephant cells, validating their methodology, Williams confirms. She anticipates that upon publication, the technique can be implemented in field conservation efforts. Animal tracking via footprints, fur, and feces, common in conservation, could facilitate sample collection in natural habitats.

“Sample freshness is likely the primary constraint,” Williams suggests. As dung samples have originated from controlled zoo environments, she speculates that weather conditions could influence dung dryness and consequently sample quality. “Samples exposed to direct sunlight might be less suitable, suggesting preference for samples found in shaded locations,” she adds.

From Excrement to Embryos: Future Potential

Genetic analysis represents just one application of the Poo Zoo’s research. Another potential avenue lies in extracting cells from feces for generating embryos via artificial insemination.

In 2006, Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka discovered cell “reprogramming” capabilities, enabling conversion into various cell types, including sperm and egg cells. He was awarded the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for this groundbreaking work. These reprogrammed cells, known as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have been used to produce healthy mouse offspring, and research is expanding to other species.

However, Williams acknowledges significant hurdles before fecal cell isolation becomes viable for biobanking: “Maintaining sample cleanliness remains the paramount challenge. Collecting cells from feces inherently involves highly contaminated, bacteria-rich environments.”

Dr. Thomas Hildebrandt, a professor of reproduction management at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research in Germany, emphasizes the difficulty of decontaminating such specimens, calling it “very, very challenging” and resource-intensive. Hildebrandt, unaffiliated with the Poo Zoo but a former collaborator with Williams on rhino fertility research, heads one of Europe’s largest biobanking facilities.

“While this technology can provide crucial insights into an animal’s genetic makeup and potentially health status, I remain skeptical about achieving sufficient cell cleanliness for iPSC applications,” Hildebrandt states. He also expresses concern that fecal contamination might alter the “epigenetic profile”—environmental influence on gene function. He argues that embryo creation necessitates “the highest quality cells.”

Hildebrandt notes that current biobanking mainly relies on samples from captive animals. Veterinarians routinely collect blood samples from unwell animals, suitable for biobanking. Though blood cell extraction is ‘more complex’ than skin biopsies, it simplifies fecal collection. Legal procedures for sample usage often present greater obstacles than extraction, he adds.

While wild animal samples could enhance biobanking diversity, Hildebrandt highlights potential risks, including unknown diseases, that could render samples unsuitable.

Despite his reservations, Hildebrandt remains optimistic about the project’s potential. “Science can offer unexpected solutions,” he concludes, “and sometimes the answer is not immediately apparent.”

The Significance of Dung Diversity for Genetic Preservation

While biobanking applications remain distant, Bolton and Williams believe the Poo Zoo offers a cost-effective method for gathering genetic data from both zoo and wild animals. They are expanding their research to encompass more species to further refine their methods.

“Biodiversity loss is occurring at an alarming rate; species survival depends on genetic diversity,” Bolton emphasizes. “Non-invasive techniques can broaden data collection, ensuring more cells are gathered and greater diversity is preserved.”

The current rapid decline in wildlife and ecosystems is often termed the “sixth mass extinction.” As animal populations shrink and become isolated, inbreeding risks escalate. This reduces genetic diversity, making animals more vulnerable to threats like disease and climate change, while increasing the likelihood of adverse genetic traits.

A recent meta-analysis revealed declining genetic diversity across numerous species, affecting two-thirds of wildlife studied. Another study, using statistical analysis instead of DNA samples, found that 58% of species lacked sufficiently large populations to maintain genetic diversity.

“Increased genetic diversity strengthens animal populations, enhancing disease resistance,” Williams explains.

Williams envisions broad applications for this technology across all species as extinctions become increasingly common.

“Ideally, this work would be unnecessary in a world where animals are not endangered, and their habitats are protected,” Williams reflects. “Given the current reality, this research is crucial and impactful.”

For more news and updates, please visit CNN.com.


🕐 Top News in the Last Hour By Importance Score

# Title 📊 i-Score
1 Gold jumps above $3,300 and global shares sell off after US curbs chip sales to China; UK inflation slows – business live 🟢 85 / 100
2 Racially charged row between Musk and South Africa over Starlink 🟢 82 / 100
3 Donald Trump's defence officials escorted from Pentagon amid 'unauthorised leaks' probe 🔴 75 / 100
4 Pentagon deputy chief of staff Darin Selnick is suspended amid probe into 'unauthorized disclosure' of classified information 🔴 72 / 100
5 Plans to downgrade 2nd class post could see Royal Mail becoming the next victim of a taxpayer bail out 🔴 70 / 100
6 Conspiracy theorists seize on Blue Origin door gaffe – and claim it's 'definitive proof' that Katy Perry's mission was FAKE 🔵 55 / 100
7 Eggs Too Expensive? Try These 4 Alternatives for Easter Dyeing 🔵 50 / 100
8 The student arrested at his naturalization interview knew it was coming 🔵 45 / 100
9 Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst gets her first Democratic challenger for 2026 🔵 45 / 100
10 'Greatest gangster movie ever made' is all-time classic that's 'better than The Godfather' 🔵 45 / 100

View More Top News ➡️