Leftists’ new ‘no stops’ bill aims to keep thugs and killers ON the roads

Controversial Bill Limits Police Traffic Stops in New York

Critics are raising concerns about a proposed bill in Albany that would restrict law enforcement officers from initiating traffic stops for minor infractions, such as defective tail lights or outdated registration tags. This legislative effort is purportedly aimed at promoting racial equity within the state’s policing practices.

Racial Equity or Public Safety Risk?

Proponents of the bill argue that these types of stops disproportionately affect minority drivers. However, opponents contend that eliminating these stops could undermine public safety. They point to instances where traffic stops for minor violations have led to the apprehension of individuals involved in more serious crimes. A notable example is the case of serial killer Joel Rifkin, who was apprehended during a traffic stop for a missing license plate while transporting a body.

The Importance of Enforcing Minor Violations

While acknowledging that driving with broken lights or expired tags are not major offenses in themselves, law enforcement experts emphasize that addressing minor violations plays a crucial role in preventing more significant criminal activities. Similar to how addressing fare evasion in public transit systems can deter larger crimes, enforcing minor traffic laws helps maintain order and deters reckless behavior.

Erosion of Public Safety Concerns

Critics warn that relaxing enforcement of minor traffic violations could lead to an increase in more dangerous behaviors, such as speeding, intoxicated driving, and general disregard for traffic laws. They suggest that this normalization of disregard for “small” laws can erode public confidence in law enforcement and create a sense of lawlessness.

Political Motivations and Bureaucratic Burden

State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a candidate for Manhattan borough president, is a key proponent of the bill. Critics suggest his support is politically motivated, intended to appeal to voters as a champion of minority communities. Furthermore, even in situations where officers are permitted to conduct traffic stops for minor infractions under the proposed law, they would face increased administrative burdens, including extensive paperwork and the mandatory collection of racial data, which could deter proactive policing.

Potential Consequences and Public Reaction

Opponents of the bill argue it is misguided and dangerous, reflecting a broader trend of what they view as lenient criminal justice reforms in New York State. They express concern that if the public does not voice opposition, lawmakers may fail to recognize the potential negative impact on public safety. There is a fear that such policies could contribute to a decline in overall order and safety on roads and in communities.