'A problem that doesn't exist': Democrats, activists slam Texas voter fraud bills

Hundreds of Texans flooded the state Capitol on Saturday, some waiting late into the evening to testify on a pair of restrictive voting bills that Republican lawmakers are pushing through the state Legislature.

In dual marathon hearings, members of state House and Senate committees heard hours of testimony from invited witnesses and members of the public, many of whom had traveled by buses organized by Democrats and voting rights advocates to speak out against the legislation.

Former Congressman Beto O’Rourke, a Democrat who narrowly lost a 2018 U.S. Senate bid, was one of nearly 250 people who signed up to testify. Some 11 hours after arriving at the Capitol, he spoke to the Senate panel.

“It is the big lie that is the source and inspiration for so many of these voter suppression bills,” O’Rourke said. “Some of you are akin to the arsonist who wants to light the fire, and then get credit for trying to put it out, because you say, look, there may not be a statistically meaningful level of voter fraud, but my constituents are worried about it. Well, why are they worried about it? Because you keep talking about a problem that doesn’t exist and then trying to apply a solution that’s in search of a real problem.”

Texas is one of dozens of states that have worked this year to implement sweeping new voting restrictions, fueled in part by former President Donald Trump’s repeated false claims that the 2020 election was stolen through rampant fraud, something Democrats have declared “the big lie.” There has been no evidence of voter fraud, in Texas or elsewhere, that affected the outcome of the election, in which Trump lost by more than 7 million votes.

The pair of election bills, Senate Bill 1 and House Bill 3, were introduced earlier this week and hearings were scheduled quickly. They are updated versions of the legislation Democrats blocked in May when they staged a late-night walkout that forced the Legislature to adjourn before the measures could pass. Both bills are expected to pass out of committee.

The legislation would require voters to provide identification for mail voting and would ban drive-thru and overnight options for early voting. Harris County, a heavily minority and liberal area of the state that is home to Houston, embraced those expanded early voting options during the 2020 general election. The bills would also add criminal penalties for voting law violations and empower partisan poll watchers, while adding a spate of new restrictions on how Texans help others cast a ballot.

Democrats and voter-rights advocates have condemned the bill as unnecessary and discriminatory, arguing they will suppress the votes of Texans of color and those with disabilities.

The bills were considered in simultaneous hearings, with House and Senate lawmakers trading witnesses, as the legislators and voters sparred over voter fraud and ballot box access.

Numerous voters with disabilities spoke out in the Senate hearing against the legislation, arguing that the restrictions expose helpers to undue scrutiny and prosecution. These voters already face challenges participating in democracy, one witness added: The Senate hearing was scheduled with just 48 hours’ notice, even though the Legislature requires witnesses to request disability accommodations 72 hours before their appearances.

Republicans say the legislation is critical to preventing voter fraud. Numerous people who identified themselves as election workers testified in support of the bill, some making unproven claims of widespread voter fraud.

Bill author Sen. Bryan Hughes, a Republican from East Texas, said that the Texas attorney general had voter fraud charges pending against 44 defendants. More than 11 million people voted in Texas last year.

State Sen. Royce West, a Democrat from Dallas County, stayed laser focused on those numbers, dividing 44 by 11 million during the hearing and and repeatedly pointing to “point zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, four” as an incredibly low rate of alleged fraud.

Jonathan White, head of the Election Integrity Division in the Texas Attorney General’s office, said it was hard to prosecute those cases.

Chuck DeVore, a vice president of the Texas Public Policy Foundation, argued that “common sense” indicated that voter fraud happens despite the few prosecutions, just as Texas drivers speed near his home when police aren’t around.

David Weinberg, who testified against the bill on behalf of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, rejected that argument by noting that online reports indicate 688,000 Texans received a speeding ticket in one recent year.

More than eight hours into the Senate hearing and 12 hours into the House hearing, the proceedings showed little signs of slowing, even as witnesses expressed fatigue at the long day.

Crystal Chism, a city councilwoman from DeSoto, Texas, testified in the Senate that the bill took power away from voters.

“I don’t want to choose my voters,” she said. “I want them to choose me.”

source: nbcnews.com