Norton Secure VPN review: More work is needed for this privacy product to shine – CNET

There are few more familiar names in information security than Norton and Symantec. Long known for their competitive antivirus protection and ability to adapt to an ever-changing security industry, a Virtual Private Network (VPN) from Norton Symantec sounds promising at the outset. But with limited server options and a few dealbreaker security issues, it’s clear that the Norton Secure VPN still has some work to do before it can meet the high standards set by its sibling security products.  

Norton Secure VPN still has toom to develop its security and server network. I’d recommend holding out before signing up to this service. In the meantime, check out our list of the best VPN services of 2020.

Getty / Linus Strandholm / EyeEm

Speed

  • Average speed loss: 57%
  • Number of servers: 1,500 (1200 virtual)
  • Number of server locations: 29 countries, 73 cities
  • Number of IP addresses: 1,800-plus

I ran my speed tests over the course of three days, in two locations, using both wireless and ethernet connections — one location offered slower broadband speeds, and the other offered higher speeds via fiber-optic internet. Internet speeds in the US vary widely by state and provider. And with any speed test, results are going to rely on your local infrastructure, with hyperfast internet service yielding higher test speed results. 

That’s one reason I’m more interested in testing the amount of speed lost (which for most VPNs is typically half or more) across both high-speed and slower connection types, and in using tools like speedtest.net to even out the playing field. Overall, Norton’s speeds are on par with other midtier VPNs, achieving only about 43% of the average 187 Mbps speed achieved on a 1 Gbps-capable fiber connection during testing, while still maintaining an average of around 81 Mbps globally. 

Unlike many other VPNs, Norton doesn’t allow you to choose the city you connect to — only the country. Norton’s Hong Kong servers dragged down overall speed scores, averaging just 6 Mbps. So if you’re looking for a VPN to use while travelling in China, you may want to consider a different option. Australian servers performed marginally better, averaging around 50 Mbps. 

Mainland European scores could have been better, crossing the finish line with a 78 Mbps average, as French servers outperformed German ones. And while US servers landed a disappointing 92 Mbps average, UK servers shone with a 181 Mbps average. The inconsistency in connection speeds and load times could be starkly improved by allowing you to choose the city you connect to. US speeds, in particular, could be improved if you could choose which coast to connect to. 

Read more: ExpressVPN review: A VPN speed leader with a secure reputation

Security and Privacy

  • Jurisdiction: US 
  • Encryption: AES-256
  • Leaks: IPv6, DNS
  • No kill switch 

Along with city-specific server selection, publicly disclosing more information about its servers would also greatly improve Norton’s security offerings. To that end, a Norton spokesperson told CNET back in September that new security assessments were on the way.

“Symantec worked with (international auditing firm) RSM to conduct a third-party privacy assessment of Norton Secure VPN that is in the process of being finalized,” the spokesperson said. 

Norton offers what it calls bank-grade encryption, standard AES-256. The company offers no kill switch, which would prevent network data from leaking outside of their secure VPN tunnel in the event the VPN connection fails. A lack of kill switch I’d generally consider a deal breaker. 

Norton didn’t mask my IPv6 address, and I saw several DNS leaks during testing with IPLeak.net. These leaks disclose user-identifying data, which compromise your location privacy. While Norton describes itself as a no-log VPN provider, it does detail its concerning collection of usage data in its privacy policy, which includes “temporary Usage Data to assist with debugging a problem with the service.” Norton told CNET it has no plans to stop logging this data. 

Norton Secure VPN does offer a streamlined ad-tracking blocker feature within the app. Although you can’t customize it, it worked like a charm with every testing device I tried. 

Read more: The best VPN services for 2020

Cost 

  • Usability: Extremely simple
  • Platforms: Windows, Android, Mac, iOS 
  • Price: 10-device annual plan for $60. 
  • Number of simultaneous connections: Plans available for 1, 5, or 10 devices

Norton’s inability to overcome geoblocking as described above is also the likely reason we had difficulty accessing country-specific catalogues for streaming services such as Netflix. Norton also does not support torrenting or peer-to-peer networks. If you’re looking for a VPN that will allow you to access your normal media subscriptions while travelling, we recommend seeking a different VPN for now. 

Norton Secure VPN is only available on the four main platforms — Windows, Android, Mac and iOS. The number of devices you can use simultaneously — either one, five or 10 — depends on which plan you opt for. The least expensive plan is the $5 monthly plan, which allows only one device at a time. The most expensive is the 10-device annual plan for $60. 

These prices are higher than expected, given the VPN’s limited abilities. Meanwhile, major players in the VPN sphere are getting more competitive with pricing. IPVanish offers comparable speeds and 10 simultaneous connections for $48 annually, and NordVPN is offering a buy-one-get-one deal on its three-year plan for $126. 

You can pay Norton by either credit card or PayPal, but not via cryptocurrency at this time. Norton does offer a 60-day money-back guarantee, but that offer is exclusively reserved for annual subscribers and not monthly subscribers. Norton also offers a seven-day trial. 

Read more: NordVPN review: Still the best value for security and speed

Norton Secure VPN.

source: cnet.com