Anita Hill: FBI should probe Kavanaugh anew

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

Anita Hill on Wednesday lent support to the accuser of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, offering her own experience before the Senate Judiciary Committee 27 years ago as evidence that the process of airing sexual allegations will not be fair.

“My belief is that, without an investigation, there cannot be an effective hearing,” Hill told Judy Woodruff of “PBS NewsHour.”

Accuser Christine Blasey Ford has stood fast against a much-touted Monday committee hearing without the FBI investigating her claim first. The California research psychologist said Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than 30 years ago at a drunken high school party.

He denies the allegation and, according to Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, believes Ford has him mixed up with someone else.

Hill alleged that when she worked for Clarence Thomas before he became a Supreme Court Justice in 1991 he repeatedly asked her on dates and tried to engage in conversations about sex and adult video. When the all-male Senate Judiciary Committee aired the allegations the focus was on Hill and lewd details about what she recalled.

During the 1991 hearing, Hill said, Arlen Specter, the late Senator from Pennsylvania, “wasn’t interested really in pursuing the truth of my testimony, but was more interested in discrediting me.”

A repeat of that spectacle is “not sufficient,” said Hill, now a law, social policy and gender studies professor at Brandeis University.

But Republicans want to fast-track Kavanaugh, a nominee chosen by President Trump, before the home stretch for November midterms that threatens GOP majorities in Congress.

“I know what their staffs’ qualifications are,” Hill said of the judiciary committee. “But I doubt that they are qualified to carry out this investigation in a neutral fashion.

“I think it’s ironic that we have senators who are deciding about who is going to sit on the highest court, but they can’t really put partisanship side long enough to put together a fair hearing to get to the truth about this situation,” she said.


πŸ• Top News in the Last Hour By Importance Score

# Title πŸ“Š i-Score
1 Should I Replace My Gas Appliances With Electric? πŸ”΄ 78 / 100
2 US student journalists go dark fearing Trump crusade against pro-Palestinian speech πŸ”΄ 78 / 100
3 Kremlin celebrates as Donald Trump 'rejuvenates Russian economy' πŸ”΄ 72 / 100
4 How Trump's tariffs will impact crypto: From Bitcoin to Ethereum, world-leading experts reveal the coins most at risk – and if it's time to buy or sell (their verdicts might surprise you!) πŸ”΄ 65 / 100
5 Australia PM candidate ditches plan to end work from home πŸ”΅ 55 / 100
6 Herbs will stay fresh for months if you store them with 1 common kitchen staple πŸ”΅ 50 / 100
7 Virgil van Dijk delivers update on his Liverpool future – and reveals there is 'progress' on Reds contract talks πŸ”΅ 45 / 100
8 Shocking moment British tourist 'attacks shopkeeper and teenage boy in front of terrified family' in Thailand πŸ”΅ 45 / 100
9 Your House is like a choose-your-own adventure mystery book πŸ”΅ 45 / 100
10 Houston knows miracle March Madness win over Duke won’t matter without national championship πŸ”΅ 45 / 100

View More Top News ➑️