Apple vs. Samsung doesn’t need Supreme Court redo, DOJ says – CNET

supreme-court-apple-v-samsung.jpg

The Justice Department says the Samsung vs. Apple legal battle shouldn’t go back here. 

CNET

Even the US Department of Justice is tired of the epic legal battle between Apple and Samsung. 

The agency has recommended that the Supreme Court deny Samsung’s request for a new review of its case, also known as a writ of certiorari. 

It’s the latest tick of a five-year legal battle waged between two of the largest technology companies in the world. There seemed to be some sense of resolution last year when Samsung won a unanimous victory in the Supreme Court over how much it should pay for copying some of Apple’s key designs. But lawsuits don’t die easily.  

vCard QR Code

vCard.red is a free platform for creating a mobile-friendly digital business cards. You can easily create a vCard and generate a QR code for it, allowing others to scan and save your contact details instantly.

The platform allows you to display contact information, social media links, services, and products all in one shareable link. Optional features include appointment scheduling, WhatsApp-based storefronts, media galleries, and custom design options.

Samsung in March asked the Supreme Court to review another aspect of the case, a 2014 verdict that awarded Apple $120 million for patent infringement. Apple filed its own response in May, arguing that the high court doesn’t need to look at the matter — an assessment with which the Justice Department agrees. 

“In the view of the United States, the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied,” said a filing from earlier this month.

Samsung declined to comment. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Apple and Samsung have been battling over patents since 2012, and a question about how much money could be owed for infringing design patents made its way to the Supreme Court in October 2016, with a ruling for Samsung coming in December. The Supreme Court sent the case back to a lower court to make a new determination on the damages.

Much of the attention on this legal battle has cooled as Apple has focused its sights on a new legal squabble, this one with chipmaker Qualcomm over the value of the components used in iPhones.

The Smartest Stuff: Innovators are thinking up new ways to make you, and the things around you, smarter.

Samsung charges back: How the Galaxy S8 was built to help Samsung get its mojo back.


🕐 Top News in the Last Hour By Importance Score

# Title 📊 i-Score
1 Character.AI unveils AvatarFX, an AI video model to create lifelike chatbots 🔴 75 / 100
2 Vance says 21st century could be ‘dark time for humanity’ without close India-US alliance 🔴 75 / 100
3 Ghana president suspends chief justice in unprecedented move 🔴 72 / 100
4 Google spurned OpenAI bid for partnership, ChatGPT exec testifies at antitrust trial 🔴 62 / 100
5 When Ozempic didn't work, I went on a diet doctors warn against… the results speak for themselves 🔵 58 / 100
6 Shannon Sharpe: 5 Things About the Former NFL Player 🔵 55 / 100
7 America's most glamorous murder defendant Karen Read greeted by fans as she returns to court for trial 🔵 55 / 100
8 Canada March producer prices up 0.5% on metals — TradingView News 🔵 52 / 100
9 Ecuadorian police issue update in lynching and burning alive of 'British' man in wildlife reserve 🔵 45 / 100
10 Now conspiracy theorists claim the door on the Blue Origin ship was FAKE – as they continue to insist Katy Perry's entire launch was staged 🔵 42 / 100

View More Top News ➡️