What we know about US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities

Importance Score: 87 / 100 🟢

Amid escalating tensions in the Middle East, US President Donald Trump announced that American warplanes have conducted strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. This action marks a significant escalation in the conflict between Iran and Israel, raising concerns about regional stability. The targeted Iranian nuclear facilities included Fordo, a uranium enrichment plant, along with Natanz and Isfahan.

Key Developments in the US-Iran Conflict

“Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal,” the president stated in a televised address.

“But if peace doesn’t come quickly we will go to those other targets with precision, speed and skill.”

Product

LIGE Mens Smart Watch with Wireless Calls, Wireless, Monitor, Step Counter, Stopwatch, Multi-Sport Mode, ...
🎉 Exclusive deal [$22.39]

Buy Now
Product

Mens Sporty Hooded Sweatshirt - Navy Blue with Copper Bow Accents, Regular Fit, Machine Washable ...
🎉 Exclusive deal [$0.77]

Buy Now
Product

Mens Lightweight Breathable Basketball Running Gym Shoes - Stability Support, EVA Cushioned Sole, Vi...
🎉 Exclusive deal [$0.79]

Buy Now

  • One of the targets was Fordo, a uranium enrichment facility nestled within a remote mountainside, crucial to Iran’s nuclear program. The extent of the damage remains under assessment.
  • Israeli officials affirm they were in “full coordination” with the US in orchestrating these strikes against Iranian nuclear sites.
  • The US communicated with Iran through diplomatic channels, assuring that the airstrikes were limited and “regime change efforts” were “not planned.”
  • Iran has warned of potential retaliation, which could involve targeting US military assets within the region. Officials had previously cautioned that any US assault risked igniting a wider regional conflict.

Background: The Escalation of Tensions

The Initial Attack

On June 13, Israel initiated a surprise offensive against Iranian nuclear and military installations. The stated objective was to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed was nearing the capability to produce nuclear weapons.

Iran’s Response

Iran maintains its nuclear ambitions are solely for peaceful purposes. In response to the Israeli attack, Tehran launched a barrage of rockets and drones at Israel. This exchange of strikes has continued for over a week, evolving into an ongoing air war.

US Stance

Trump has consistently voiced his opposition to Iran possessing nuclear weapons. While Israel is widely believed to possess them, it maintains a policy of neither confirming nor denying.

Previous Assessments

In March, US intelligence officials indicated that while Iran had amplified its uranium stockpile to unprecedented quantities, it was not actively constructing a nuclear weapon – a determination that Trump recently dismissed.

Campaign Promises

During his campaign, Trump criticized previous administrations for engaging in “endless wars” in the Middle East, promising to keep America out of foreign entanglements.

Short-Lived Negotiations

The US and Iran were engaged in nuclear talks when Israel launched its attack. Just days before, Trump suggested he would grant Iran two weeks to engage in substantive negotiations before taking military action.

Details of the US Airstrikes: Targets and Weapons

Targeted Locations

The US has confirmed strikes on three Iranian nuclear locations: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan.

The Fordo Facility

Fordo, concealed within a mountainside south of Tehran, is reportedly located deeper underground than the Channel Tunnel linking the UK and France.

“Bunker Buster” Bombs

Due to its depth, Fordo’s construction makes it challenging to reach with conventional weaponry. It was believed that only the US possessed a “bunker buster” bomb powerful enough to potentially neutralize Fordo.

The GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)

The American bomb in question is the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP). Weighing approximately 13,000kg (30,000lb), experts say it can penetrate around 18m of reinforced concrete or 61m of earth before detonating.

MOP Effectiveness

While the MOP represents the best available option, given that Fordo’s tunnels are estimated to be 80m to 90m below the surface, its success is not guaranteed.

Confirmation of MOP Use

US officials have verified to CBS News that MOPs were employed in the strikes, with two bombs designated for each target.

Immediate Impact within Iran

Assessing the Damage

The extent of the damage to the nuclear facilities, along with potential injuries or casualties, remains unclear.

Iranian Claims

An Iranian official said that Iran had evacuated the three targeted nuclear sites “a while ago.” He further stated that Iran “didn’t suffer a major blow because the materials had already been taken out.”

Conflicting Reports

In his televised address, Trump asserted that the “nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated”.

Cautious Assessment

However, a former US assistant secretary of state offered a more tempered perspective, stating, “There’s no way to suggest that it has been destroyed for all time.”

Casualties

Iran has reported over 200 fatalities and more than 1,200 injuries since the latest clashes with Israel commenced.

Heightened Security in Israel

Israel is enhancing its security measures following the US attacks on Iran’s key nuclear sites.

Security Upgrade

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have implemented stricter public security protocols across the nation, including restrictions on educational activities, gatherings, and workplaces.

Potential Iranian Retaliation

While Iran has been weakened by recent Israeli attacks and the dismantling of regional proxies, it remains capable of inflicting considerable damage.

Iranian Warnings

Iranian officials have cautioned the US against involvement, suggesting it would face “irreparable damage” and risk a broader regional war.

Possible Scenarios

  • Targeting US military sites within the region. The US maintains a presence at numerous locations across the Middle East.
  • Attacking critical shipping lanes such as the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil supplies.
  • Targeting assets of countries perceived to be aiding the US.

Congressional Approval for Military Action

US Legal Framework

Under US law, the president requires Congressional authorization to formally declare war. This power rests with the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Presidential Authority

However, the president also serves as the commander in chief of the armed forces, granting the authority to deploy troops and conduct military operations without a formal declaration of war.

Past Precedents

For example, Trump’s decision to conduct airstrikes in Syria in 2017 did not necessitate Congressional approval. He acted unilaterally, citing national security and humanitarian considerations.

Congressional Efforts

Some lawmakers have sought to constrain Trump’s ability to order US strikes on Iran through a war powers resolution. However, the passage of such measures remains uncertain.


🕐 Top News in the Last Hour By Importance Score

# Title 📊 i-Score
1 X hit by complaints to EU over user data and targeted advertising — TradingView News 🔴 78 / 100
2 Meta fixes bug that could leak users’ AI prompts and generated content 🔴 78 / 100
3 Massive black hole merger forms one 225 times the mass of the sun 🔴 78 / 100
4 Immigration authorities demand landlords turn over tenant information 🔴 78 / 100
5 Spain warning as over 1100 people die in two months 🔴 78 / 100
6 ‘It’s not fair’: Crystal Palace fans march in protest at demotion from Europa League 🔴 72 / 100
7 French premier wants to scrap holidays, freeze spending to slash debt 🔴 72 / 100
8 UK households with driveways urged to make ‘easy’ £300 a month 🔴 72 / 100
9 Former BBC star slams Beeb for covering John Torode sacking 🔴 72 / 100
10 Trump claims tariff deal with Indonesia 🔴 72 / 100

View More Top News ➡️