London — A global survey of human diets has found that almost half of the people on Earth are either underfed or overfed, and our choice of nutrition has serious implications not only for our own health, but the health of the planet.
The 2021Global Nutrition Report, an independent survey conducted annually since 2013, estimates that about half of the global population is either underweight, overweight or obese. The data show that a quarter of all deaths among adults are attributable to poor diet, and that the world is not on track to meet five out of six global nutrition targets set by the World Health Organization.
Our eating habits are doing tremendous damage to the environment as well, according to the report. Food production currently generates more than a third of allglobally, and meat-heavy diets are responsible for the lion’s share of those emissions.
The Global Nutrition Report, or GNR, said that one serving of red meat is responsible for approximately 100 times the emissions of a serving of plant-based food. But theis on the rise.
High-income countries are having a disproportionate impact globally. They have the highest intake of foods with significant costs to health and the environment. Wealthy nations also have the highest proportion of premature deaths attributed to dietary risks: 31% in both North America and Europe.
According to the GNR, if all of world’s population ate the way North Americans do, greenhouse gas emissions would surge to more than 600% of the level required toto below 2°C. By comparison, if the world adopted the diets typical of African or Asian nations, the impact of human diets would only increase warming to 60–75% above sustainable levels.
Meat, men, and your money
There appears to be a gender split in how we eat. A separate study carried out in the U.K. has found that emissions associated with men’s diets were 41% higher than with women’s diets, primarily due to greater meat intake.
Healthier choices at the grocery store are often thought of as being expensive ones, but another study, led by Dr. Marco Springmann at the University of Oxford, challenges that perception, at least in wealthy places like the U.S. and Europe.
People in high-income countries would likely save money by switching to a mainly or entirely plant-based diet, whereas making these changes would cost people in lower-middle and low-income countries more money than sticking to their current eating habits, according to Springmann’s research, which was published late last month in The Lancet.
“When scientists like me advocate for healthy and environmentally-friendly eating it’s often said that we’re sitting in our ivory towers promoting something that is financially out of reach for most people,” Springmann told The Guardian. “This study shows that it’s quite the opposite. These diets could be better for your bank balance as well as your health and the health of the planet.”
Progress and hope
Some progress is being made. Of the 194 countries assessed in the GNR, 105 were found to be on track to meet the WHO target for tackling childhood overweight, and over a quarter were on track to meet targets to curb childhood stunting and wasting (children developing with height and weight deficiencies due to lack of nutrition).
The research found that apart from the personal health benefits, eating better will also help the planet.
The U.K. data show that people whose intake of saturated fats, carbohydrates, and sodium were in line with WHO recommended levels were responsible for significantly less greenhouse gas emissions than people who exceed the recommended levels. And relatively easy adjustments to shopping choices can help redress the imbalance.
“We all want to do our bit to help save the planet. Working out how to modify our diets is one way we can do that,” said the authors of the small-scale British study. “There are broad-brush concepts like reducing our meat intake, particularly red meat, but our work also shows that big gains can be made from small changes, like cutting out sweets, or potentially just by switching brands.”
Ultimately, investments to improve nutrition at the national level, create new business opportunities in regenerative agriculture, and prevent food waste could lead to estimated gains to our global society of around $5.7 trillion per year by 2030, the GNR said.
“We have never been better equipped with the evidence and tools we need” to do “what is necessary for a well-nourished and thriving population and planet,” the report concluded.
Jury deliberations in Ahmaud Arbery murder trial continues
CBS News Poll: A closer look at Americans’ views on immigration
Psychologist Lisa Damour on managing family tension during Thanksgiving