Rittenhouse, wearing a dark jacket with a burgundy tie and shirt, stood behind the defense table as each not guilty verdict was read. He tried to hold back tears, then sobbed and appeared to collapse forward on the table, where his attorney embraced him.
“It’s been a rough journey, but we made it through it. We made it through the hard part.”
Carlson’s crew has been embedded with the teen throughout the trial and the Fox News host will interview Rittenhouse on his Monday show. The documentary will air in December on the Fox Nation streaming service, Fox News said.
Rittenhouse’s mother gasped after the final verdict was read, her head falling into her hands.
The panel of five men and seven women deliberated more than 25 hours over the past four days in a closely-watched case that polarized an already divided nation. The verdict cannot be appealed.
Three verdict sheets were dated Wednesday and Thursday. The most severe charge Rittenhouse faced was a first-degree intentional homicide charge for the fatal shooting of Anthony Huber: count 4. Juror 54 signed the verdict sheet for that count Wednesday.
The two sheets signed Friday involved the fatal shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum and the charge of reckless endangerment of a man who was near Rittenhouse during the shooting.
Judge praises jury
Since the shootings on August 25, 2020, the case pitted Americans who saw Rittenhouse as an armed teen vigilante against those who viewed him as a citizen taking up arms to protect businesses from looters and rioters.
The judge praised the jurors, saying he “couldn’t have asked for a better jury.”
Some jurors appeared fatigued as the verdicts were read — their hands on their chins or rubbing their eyes, according to a pool reporter. Others seemed ill-at-ease, arms folded across their chests.
What’s next for Rittenhouse
“He has a huge sense of relief,” Richards told reporters.
“He wishes none of this would have ever happened. But, as he said when he testified, he did not start this and we’re thankful in more ways than one that the jury finally got to hear the true story.”
Richards said the decision to put Rittenhouse on the stand “wasn’t a close call.”
“In Wisconsin, if you don’t put a client on the stand, you’re going to lose. Period,” Richards added.
The attorney said Rittenhouse has had 24-hour security and does not expect to continue to live in the area.
“I think eventually some anonymity will come,” Richards said.
Prosecutor ‘disappointed’ with verdict
After the verdict, lead prosecutor Thomas Binger told the court, “The jury has represented our community in this trial and has spoken.”
Binger, in a statement, said, “While we are disappointed with the verdict, it must be respected… We ask that members of our community continue to express their opinions and feelings about this verdict in a civil and peaceful manner.”
“It sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street,” the statement said of the verdict.
“We hope that decent people will join us in forcefully rejecting that message and demanding more of our laws, our officials, and our justice system.”
Huber’s girlfriend, Hannah Gittings, was not surprised by the verdict.
“We know that this system is a failure,” she said.
Rosenbaum’s fiancée, Kariann Swart, said, “In this case, the victims’ lives don’t matter.”
Kimberley Motley and Milo Schwab, attorneys for Gaige Grosskreutz and Rosenbaum’s estate, said they will continue to seek justice.
Prosecution faced uphill battle
The high-profile verdict generated mixed reactions, from the White House to the streets of Wisconsin.
President Joe Biden, in a statement, said the verdict “will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included” but added people “must acknowledge that the jury has spoken.”
On a cold, sunny afternoon, mostly peaceful crowds gathered outside the courthouse. Protests were planned in several US cities Friday and Saturday, according to social media posts.
“We want the nation to know the nation that you live in now isn’t the … United States that we used to live in,” said Justin Blake, uncle of Jacob Blake, whose shooting by police last summer sparked the protests where Rittenhouse showed up with his gun.
The prosecution faced an uphill challenge from the start because Wisconsin law requires the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Rittenhouse did not act in self-defense. But there are limits to a self-defense claim.
“The defendant may intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm only if the defendant reasonably believed that the force used was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself,” the jury instructions explain.
“I didn’t do anything wrong. I defended myself,” he testified.
Jurors also considered lesser offenses for two of the five counts. If convicted on the most serious charge, Rittenhouse faced a mandatory sentence of life in prison.
Schroeder dismissed a misdemeanor weapons possession charge and a non-criminal curfew violation prior to deliberations.
What happened in the trial
“That is what provokes this entire incident,” Binger said in closing arguments. “When the defendant provokes this incident, he loses the right to self-defense. You cannot claim self-defense against a danger you create.”
The prosecution portrayed the three other people who confronted the teen as “heroes” trying to stop what they believed to be an active shooting. Binger also questioned the teenager’s decision to take a gun into the city in the first place, calling him a “chaos tourist.”
In closing arguments, defense attorney Richards said Rittenhouse feared for his life when he opened fire.
“Every person who was shot was attacking Kyle. One with a skateboard, one with his hands, and one with his feet, one with a gun,” Richards said. “Hands and feet can cause great bodily harm.”
The trial featured more than a dozen videos from the night that showed what happened before, during and after the shootings. Most of the facts of what happened that night were not up for debate — rather, at the heart of the trial was the analysis of Rittenhouse’s actions and whether they can be considered “reasonable.”
CNN’s Jason Kravarik, Mike Hayes, Carma Hassan, Cheri Mossburg and Chris Boyette contributed to this report.