ipadpro-2020-rearcamera

Scott Stein/CNET

There’s a feeling I sometimes get when I slip on a pair of cozy shoes or sit down in the right chair, when a laptop keyboard feels right and I’m just feeling… comfortable. That was me, the first half hour trying out a trackpad on the new iPad Pro.

Like

  • Trackpad support is useful, intuitive
  • Improved onboard microphones
  • Rear 3D room-scanning camera
  • Wi-Fi 6
  • Base model gets 128GB storage

Don’t Like

  • Same design as 2018 Pro
  • Cost with accessories adds up
  • No apps to test new AR features
  • Not notably faster than 2018 model

I’m at my desk. I’m typing on a keyboard, using a trackpad. Looking at a nice-sized 12.9-inch screen. And yes, this is like working on a computer.

I’m hesitant to say Apple’s iPad problems have been completely solved. But damn, using a real trackpad on an iPad is a magic moment that’s been three quarters of a decade overdue.

I’m wandering my home, not going anywhere. It would be great if there were one singular device Apple made that could handle every one of my needs instead of several. The new iPad Pro gets closer to being there, but its price means it’ll be a luxury option. And really, you’re probably just fine with the iPad you have.


Now playing:
Watch this:

My first week at home using the new iPad Pro



10:57

Where the trackpad shines

I love that the cursor (which is a little too big and round for me) transforms into other icons as it gets close to them. It’s like touchscreens and trackpads, merging. It’s intuitive. The whole experience feels a lot deeper than the accessibility-focused mouse support in iOS 13, and more suited to my needs.

I love even more that multifinger controls work exactly the way my muscle memory expected: Three fingers to swipe away an app. Two fingers to swipe between app panes. Three fingers up to choose a different open app. Three fingers left and right to swap apps. I can set click to tap, and there’s two-finger click, which brings up those extra menu items you get when pressing and holding on the iPad screen. It makes sense. Dare I say it’s even more intuitive than the iPad’s touchscreen, for work.

ipadpro-2020-trackpad-1

Selecting text isn’t perfect yet.


Scott Stein/CNET

Where the trackpad is still weird

I use a trackpad when I need to edit what I write. I worked on this review on the iPad. Editing with the trackpad didn’t always work like a laptop trackpad would, though. Clicking and dragging didn’t always select text — it sometimes dragged the cursor instead. Those hiccups made the experience annoying. They seem like they could be easily solved, but the way text selection works now makes it hard to move fast in the workflow. Apple is updating its core apps soon, and many of these quirks could be resolved with that update.

I’d also like to pull app windows in and out more easily. Slide Over (the name for the overlay that allows a quick-glance app to float over your existing app in iPadOS) is hard to make work with the trackpad. So is adjusting the split-pane two-apps-at-once Split View mode. The iPad already needed a more-fluid multitasking OS update, which would allow me to size and move things even more flexibly. I’d love the trackpad to help more with that, too. Yes, there are always lots of open apps (and app pairings) I can zoom out to and swap between. They help, but getting to new orientations is, well, weird.

ipadpro-2020-cameracompare

The new iPad Pro’s dual rear cameras and lidar, vs. the original 2018 iPad Pro’s single rear camera.


Scott Stein/CNET

The strange, wild possibilities of AR

I don’t know, yet, what to make of the lidar sensor on the back of the new iPad Pro. Apple is clearly running head-first into an AR future, which should involve a headset or glasses eventually. This lidar sensor is Apple’s first real hardware indicator of what could come. The scanner’s 5-meter (16.4-foot) range and ability to 3D mesh an environment is exactly what should be in an AR headset, like a Magic Leap or Microsoft HoloLens. It’ll likely be in Apple’s next iPhones, too.

I saw hints of this future when I played with Occipital’s Structure camera system for the iPad years ago. There were also Google’s Tango phones, which could scan the world and do depth-mapping. Apple’s solution may be far better, but I haven’t been able to test it with any apps that show what it can do. In a way, it’s a farther-reaching version of the close-range 3D-scanning TrueDepth camera on the front of most iPhones, and the iPad Pro.

ARKit apps load up faster and place objects better, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Scanning 3D objects, meshing reality and overlaying things, mapping reality out via a tablet… I’m curious what comes next. For some professionals, it’ll be amazing. But it’s a specialized feature that most people won’t need at all. And many apps are already figuring out ways to scan environments without any extra depth-sensing hardware at all.

It’s a big step for Apple, and I can’t wait to try what apps come next, but it’s hardly necessary, and I can’t judge what it can do yet.

ipadpro-2020-macbook-1

MacBook (left) or iPad Pro (right)? The new iPad Pro is still in the middle (middle).


Scott Stein/CNET

Otherwise, very much the same iPad Pro

The new A12Z processor on the 2020 Pro, based on Geekbench 5 benchmarks, didn’t show much speed difference at all compared to the October 2018 iPad Pro. Apple hasn’t made any great speed claims, either, but it promises graphics boosts and better thermals for sustained graphics over time (and for high-intensity AR stuff that the lidar sensor enables). The chip isn’t based on the A13 in the iPhone 11, oddly. But then again, the iPad Pro still has blazing speed, and it’s still technically the most powerful iOS device. 

The design, from the excellent-but-not-OLED LCD “Liquid Retina” display to the FaceID camera to the USB-C port to the magnetically-attaching Pencil, is the same. The rear camera is the lone change, with a camera-squircle similar to the iPhone 11 family that also means you’ll need a new case to fit the different camera hole.

Adding more storage to the base model (128GB instead of 64GB), at least, means the $800 (or $1,000) base price is a real option to consider. Still, anyone editing video or working on graphics or art may consider the 256GB version instead.

There are other tweaks (Wi-Fi 6, which is nice for faster networking and better on-board microphones, for what it’s worth), but in a lot of ways the 2020 iPad Pro proposition is similar to what it was in late 2018.

ipadpro-2020-bookshelf

The iPad Pro fits right in on my magic bookshelf.


Scott Stein/CNET

But consider a less expensive iPad for a trackpad update, too

The best news is that trackpad support is coming to tons of other iPads. In these chaotic times, you could easily stay with what you have,

Because I’ve only used the iPad for a handful of days, this is a review in progress. I want to see more updated apps that finesse the trackpad (Apple’s suite of apps, including Pages and Numbers, for starters), and apps that use the new functions of AR. And I want to try a keyboard case that integrates the trackpad and see how that works, too.

This is the best iPad, but for its price it better be. It’s also closer to being my One Machine. But at this moment, based on what I’ve experienced, I love working on it… but I’ll still be using a laptop, too.

source: cnet.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here