Warmbier family rebuke Trump's praise of Kim Jong-un

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionWas Kim Jong-un really clueless about US student Otto Warmbier’s ordeal?

The family of a US student who died after he was jailed in North Korea have implicitly rebuked President Donald Trump’s lauding of Kim Jong-un.

Otto Warmbier’s parents said they had been “respectful” during Mr Trump and the North Korean leader’s recent summit, but were now speaking out.

They said “no excuse or lavish praise can change” that “Kim and his evil regime” killed their son.

Their statement came after Mr Trump heaped yet more compliments on Mr Kim.

Mr Trump’s second nuclear summit with Mr Kim this week in Vietnam ended without agreement.

  • What to make of the summit collapse?

What did the Warmbiers say?

The family released a brief statement on Friday condemning praise for the North Korean leader, without mentioning Mr Trump by name.

“We have been respectful during this summit process. Now we must speak out,” wrote Fred and Cindy Warmbier.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Fred and Cindy Warmbier were guests at Mr Trump’s 2018 State of the Union speech

“Kim and his evil regime are responsible for the death of our son Otto.

“Kim and his evil regime are responsible for unimaginable cruelty and inhumanity. No excuse or lavish praise can change that.”

Warmbier, a University of Virginia student, was jailed in Pyongyang in January 2016 during an organised tour, accused of stealing a hotel poster.

The 22-year-old was sentenced to 15 years’ hard labour, but released after 17 months.

He was returned to the US in a vegetative state in June 2017, and died days later in his hometown of Cincinnati, Ohio.

What did President Trump say?

  • Trump defends Kim over US student’s death

Mr Trump told reporters in Hanoi, referring to Mr Warmbier’s death: “He [Mr Kim] tells me he didn’t know about it, and I will take him at his word.”

The president added that Mr Kim felt “very badly” about the case.

In a Fox News interview aired late on Thursday, Mr Trump said Mr Kim was “sharp as you can be” and “a real leader”.

“Some people say I shouldn’t like him,” the US president told Fox News host Sean Hannity, a vocal Trump advocate. “Why shouldn’t I like him?”

The president said he gets along “really well” with Mr Kim, describing him as “a pretty mercurial guy”.

  • Trump defends Kim over US student’s death

“He’s a character. He’s a real personality. He’s very smart.”

Explaining why the summit broke down, Mr Trump said: “Well, they wanted to denuke certain areas and I wanted everything.”

Hannity defended the president’s decision to walk away, recommending a reading of Mr Trump’s book, The Art of the Deal, to truly “understand” his tactics.

More on Trump-Kim summit

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionBBC’s Laura Bicker explains why Trump is the ‘biggest loser’ from the summit

What’s the reaction?

Democrats led criticism of the president, pointing out that Mr Trump has previously sided with strongmen.

After meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in July 2018, the US president said he believed his denial that the Kremlin sought to interfere in the 2016 US election, despite US intelligence officials concluding otherwise.

  • Even Trump allies shocked by Putin summit

Critics also pointed out that last December, Mr Trump defended Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman despite CIA officials’ belief that the royal had ordered the gruesome murder of a US-based reporter, Jamal Khashoggi.

Russian media trash Trump

Analysis by BBC Monitoring

Russian state-controlled media – once quite the fans of Donald Trump – were scathing about the US president’s performance at the talks.

A Channel One report from the summit said it had “failed miserably, dealing another blow to the reputation of the American leader”.

Over on Rossiya 1 TV, a presenter said the outcome was “predictable”, as Mr Trump had “arrived at the new summit with old tactics”, while NTV pointed out that Russia had warned Washington’s “position of ultimatums” would not work.

One Rossiya 1 presenter suggested Mr Trump had only been interested in distracting people from the testimony of his former lawyer, Michael Cohen.

In the papers, the independent Novaya Gazeta looks on the bright side, saying that the leaders – while “still extremely far from the Nobel Peace Prize” – have at least stopped swapping insults.

But in mass tabloid Moskovsky Komsomolets, one pundit is withering, saying one “has to understand the core of a subject to make compromises, while Trump is the most ignorant head of state in US history”.

source: bbc.com