Why are you acting like every game that’s 75-89 is pure trash? Don’t tell me that you only play games based on their Metascores. That literally just discredits the majority of Switch’s own library, leaving only 14 games with 90 and above. If you paid all that money for a console just to play 14 games because you want to feel elite I seriously pity you. Even then there’s still more 90+ games on PS4 than Switch, so your priorities are all kinds of screwed up.
Why are you equating games that have a 75-89 as the same as a game getting a 50? Are you seriously so dense that you a 75 game is the same as the bottom of the barrel 50 game?
It’s clear that it somehow causes you discomfort to acknowledge that Sony can produce as much impressive content on their consoles as Nintendo even when there’s clear evidence that supports this fact, and for that you have my pity. You speak of changing goalposts yet you try to change the criteria so much that you end up discrediting yourself.
Speaking about years, let’s compare the quality of exclusives that Sony and Nintendo respectively sent the PS3 & Wii U off with towards the end of their lifecycle before moving onto their next consoles.
https://secure.metacritic.c…
https://secure.metacritic.c…
While one sent off their flagship console gracefully, the other just flat out abandoned its loyal fanbase to move onto greener pastures. You wanna talk about that as well or does that aspect get swept under the rug because it too is inconvenient?