When will humanity ever hit the peak of its ever-growing carbon emissions?

We were duped. 

Or, at least, we were given some false hope. In the three years between 2014 and 2016, global carbon emissions from the burning of fossil fuels had finally stopped increasing and leveled out. Emissions weren’t yet going down — but there was the potential that they had peaked. 

Perhaps, mused scientists, this was the fruitful beginning of humanity’s collective response to alter the course of history, and in doing so, avoid the mounting woes wrought by climate change. 

But, no. With 2017 came news that emissions had ticked up. And, critically, the newly-released 2018 Global Carbon Budget Report shows that carbon emissions bumped up yet again in 2018, and are now at their highest levels on record.

The hard truth is that unless the four major carbon players — the U.S., China, European Union (EU), and India — make ambitious cuts over the coming decade, carbon emissions will likely continue to ratchet up.

“Emissions will probably rise until 2030,” Glen Peters, a global carbon cycle researcher at the Center for International Climate Research, said in an interview. 

“That’s sort of a depressing answer,” Peters, an author of the annual climate report, acknowledged.

But, he emphasized, our carbon-saturated fate is not yet sealed. 

The big four carbon players have considerable room to make more ambitious commitments to reduce carbon emissions, Peters noted. And they carry powerful sway, accounting for 60 percent of global carbon emissions.

“The math doesn’t work if you don’t have movement by the major emitters,” Kelly Levin, a senior associate at the World Resources Institute, an environmental research organization, said in an interview. 

“If they [the big emitters] go down slightly, then we’ll start moving,” added Peters.

In 2015, 185 global nations pledged to reduce their carbon emissions at the Paris Agreement. The U.S., for example, then guided by the Obama Administration, pledged to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. 

That’s ambitious. But for global numbers to start falling, the U.S. along with the other big players, will simply need to do better. 

“If those [carbon commitments] are not strengthened, emissions are expected to rise through 2030,” said Levin. 

In 2020, global nations will meet again — at a still undetermined place — and potentially agree to more dramatic cuts. 

Meeting lofty goals

Solving the carbon problem isn’t just the responsibility of the big emitters. It’s everyone’s problem.

But some nations might off-set the carbon produced by other big polluters, said Peters, which could help hit the emissions peak, and thereafter, a drop. If emissions in the EU and U.S. dropped quickly enough, for example, they could cancel out the still rising emissions from China — a country that alone accounts for whopping 30 percent of the globe’s carbon emissions. 

SEE ALSO: Greenland is in hot water

Reaching our carbon climax in the coming years, well before 2030, may prove more realistic than hitting some ambitious overall global warming targets, specifically one set out by the Paris Agreement: limiting global warming to 1.5 Celsius (or 2.7 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial revolution levels. 

Limiting warming to 1.5 Celsius is widely seen as a means of mitigating the damaging effects of climate change, whose warming has already enhanced wildfires, heat waves, and extreme flooding. 

“Even at the 1.5-degree level, there will be impacts on climate,” Anthony Broccoli, a climate scientist at Rutgers University, said over email. 

“The important difference between limiting the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees versus going beyond that threshold is that impacts will be easier to adapt to. The adverse impacts of a 1.5-degree warming will be even worse with greater warming.”