In nearly a decade and a half covering the tech industry, I’ve had the privilege of witnessing companies T-Mobile G1, the original Android phone.when showing off their new products. One of the more awkward is the image of Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin on Rollerblades gliding up to the stage to talk about the
From the over-the-top Samsung Galaxy Note 4 presentation at Radio City Music Hall in New York to David Blaine performing at the launch of the dual-screen Kyocera Echo (the magician’s tricks were far more memorable than the phone), companies have pulled stunts to nab your attention. But this odd moment is one that I can’t unsee.
The G1, unveiled 10 years ago on Sunday, marked the start of a phenomenon that now touches the lives of millions of people around the world. With more than 2 billion active Android devices today, and nine out of every 10 devices running the software, it’s a certifiable force in technology. It helped revolutionize what a modern smartphone could be, bringing the experience to the masses.
It all started with that launch.
“I remember so many cameras there,” recalled Peter Chou, the then-CEO of HTC who took part in unveiling the G1. “I was kind of like, Wow; this is really, really big.”
Given its success today, it’s easy to forget that Android faced a heavy dose of skepticism at the start. The little-known operating system was taking on stalwarts Nokia, Windows Mobile and BlackBerry, and Apple’s iPhone had nabbed everyone’s attention. Looking back, the event now seems like a playbook on how not to launch a flagship phone.
When Google finally took the wraps off Android on Sept. 23, 2008, it partnered with HTC, a little-known company that made smartphones carrying the brand names of other companies. The carrier partner was T-Mobile, half a decade before the Un-carrier campaign, when the company was still a struggling last-place national player. And back then, having an exclusivity deal with the right carrier mattered.
“It certainly seemed like there was an uphill battle,” said Ross Rubin, an analyst at Reticle Research, who was also at the event.
So it was right about when Page and Brin rolled onto the stage that I started wondering where this was all going.
An unusual start
It was a brisk September morning in New York when I walked into the event, located in a studio space housed beneath the beginning of the double-decker Queensboro Bridge. It looked like any other product launch, with rows of chairs parked in front of a stage with a large monitor, only the morning traffic was zooming by above us.
The unusual venue was fitting for the launch of a new platform.
“It was clear we were on the cusp of something major,” said Avi Greengart, an analyst at Global Data who attended the event.
The roots of Android can be traced back to a startup Andy Rubin founded in 2000 called Danger, which created the Sidekick, a cult favorite phone with a distinctive slide-out keyboard. In 2004, Rubin, who isn’t related to the analyst, left Danger for his follow-up act, a little company called Android. A year later, Google bought it for around $50 million.
Even before the acquisition, Rubin and HTC’s Chou were already working together to plot the next generation of smartphones.
“We discussed the vision of how we could make the mobile internet experience so much easier for mass-market consumers,” Chou said.
Google and Rubin declined a request for an interview.
To get a sense of the power the carriers held, it was T-Mobile Chief Technology Officer Cole Brodman, not Rubin, who unveiled the G1.
Then Page and Brin skated up, having made their way across town on rollerblades (beats Manhattan traffic). Brin talked about the first app he wrote for the G1, a timer that starts when you throw the phone in the air. He then tossed it up.
“I was suggesting we don’t ship with that one,” Page cracked.
Brin’s point was that the open operating system meant anyone could create apps and customize their phone experience.
“I’m a bit of a geek,” he said. “I like tinkering with things.”
That interesting, weird look
That ethos helped establish the dynamic between Android and Apple’s iOS in the early years. The iPhone was a tightly controlled experience designed for more users who just wanted something to work, while Android appealed to more tech-savvy tinkerers willing to customize their phones.
While Android eventually became a juggernaut, the G1 itself garnered mixed reviews. Many knocked the smartphone’s then-bulky design, though it looks positively tiny next to modern phablets like the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 or the iPhone XS Max. It also lacked things like pinch-to-zoom and email support for Exchange.
There was the slide-out keyboard, which mimicked the older Sidekick phone, but Android’s touch-friendly user interface rendered it less critical. There was also the awkward bottom “chin” that bent at an angle and the physical trackball control.
“The G1 is definitely not the sleekest device, and we certainly wouldn’t call it sexy,” said Bonnie Cha, who wrote the original CNET review. “Instead, the words ‘interesting’ and ‘weird’ come to mind.”
Still, most critics praised the Android software and the promise of future phones to come.
There was reason to be skeptical. Entrenched players like Nokia, Microsoft and BlackBerry (then known as Research in Motion) dominated the market for smartphones. Nokia, which wasn’t as popular in the US, had such a far lead around the world that few questioned its future.
While Google was already a powerhouse in search, its mobile chops were largely untested.
The G1 ultimately was a success for T-Mobile, but that didn’t necessarily mean everyone was clamoring for an Android phone. A strong launch at the No. 4 carrier in the US didn’t exactly equate to blockbuster success.
Also, not everyone wanted to tinker with their phone.
It wasn’t until a year later, when Google partnered with Verizon and Motorola to release the original Droid, which benefited from a $100 million marketing campaign, that Android hit the mainstream. That combined the marketing and retail might of Verizon, the know-how of Motorola and even a little Star Wars influence. (Verizon paid Lucasfilm for the right to use the Droid name.)
A different world
Ten years later, the smartphone landscape is dramatically different. Back then, white-collar workers or the tech savvy might have one. Today, you probably stare at your smartphone in the toilet.
Nine out of every 10 smartphones sold now run on Android. Apple generates the lion’s share of the industry’s profits by targeting high-end consumers. It’s a two-horse race.
“I’d be lying if I told you that I knew it would be powering 90 percent of the world’s smartphones,” said Brodman, who now runs a wireless software startup called M87. “It’s literally changed the way the world connects.”
Microsoft’s Windows Mobile (later rebranded Windows Phone), the BlackBerry OS and Nokia’s Symbian software are gone, each player moving too slowly to reach the bar set by Apple and Google. Both companies leaned heavily on the idea of an app store, building up a lead in programs and developer support that other competitors couldn’t match.
There are still new BlackBerry and Nokia phones coming out — but they all run Android, and aren’t even built by the original companies. A Chinese company, TCL, paid for the rights to use the BlackBerry name, while a startup formed from Nokia vets called HMD Global builds new Nokia phones.
The Open Handset Alliance, which Google created to rally multiple carriers and handset makers around Android in the early days, gave way to the search giant taking full control of the operating system. You don’t hear about the OHA anymore. Subsequent updates to Android made it more palatable for the average consumer with more improvements to the user interface.
The past decade also saw the rise and fall of HTC, which emerged from the G1 as a serious Android handset vendor willing to push the capabilities of the platform with industry-firsts like theand the . It took advantage of the early work in Android to create the much-believed HTC Sense user interface at a time when stock Android was still a little clunky.
“When we first encountered what became Android, we saw a platform that allowed for much greater customization by consumers with a focus on allowing users to easily find applications and we invested in a big way,” HTC CEO and Chairwoman Cher Wang said in a statement.
But ultimately, the small Taiwanese company couldn’t withstand the competitive force of telecom giants like Samsung and Huawei. While HTC continues to make phones, the business is a shadow of its former self as the company focuses its resources on virtual reality. Googleto work on the Pixel franchise.
Likewise, investments into new mobile operating systems like Samsung’s Tizen, Mozilla’s Firefox and Ubuntu went no where.
While handset players come and go, Android remains.
“Android will continue to dominate the smartphone market — that’s for sure,” said Chou, who left HTC in 2015 to work on a secretive startup project.
The next step
But that tremendous success has come with intense scrutiny.
In July, the European Commission slapped a record $5 billion fine on Google for its business practices around Android, particularly the preinstallation of services like its search engine and its Google Play store.
The tech giant has also been in a longstanding legal battle with software maker Oracle over the creation of Android. Oracle sued Google in 2010 over Android’s use of the Java programming language, which Oracle obtained when it acquired Sun Microsystems. At stake is the prospect that Google pays $9 billion in damages.
Google, for its part, hasn’t stopped at just smartphones. It created a variant of Android called Wear OS to power wearables, as well as Android Auto for cars, and it’s jumped into other areas, like smart speakers powered by its Google Assistant. The company’s Google I/O developer conference is one of the hottest tickets around because it points to new areas that its investing in, like artificial intelligence or augmented reality.
Meanwhile, the big innovations in smartphones have plateaued over the last few years.
“I’m a little sad, because there’s not much to talk about with smartphones now,” Chou said. “Those days, every year we came out with something. We always had a story we could talk about.”
Or at least an awkward smartphone launch event worth remembering.
The story originally published on Sept. 21 at 5 a.m. PT.
Update, 10:30 a.m. PT: To include additional background. Update, Sept. 22 at 6 a.m. PT: To include additional details. Update, Sept. 23 at 8 a.m. PT: To include additional background and links.
CNET’s Rich Nieva contributed to this story.
Pixel 2 review: It still has an amazing camera, but its followup is expected soon.
Rumored specs, features, leaks and released date