Bannon subpoenaed by House panel after refusing to answer questions

WASHINGTON — Steve Bannon told lawmakers investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election that the White House instructed him not to answer questions related to his tenure as a top White House adviser, prompting a rare subpoena to compel testimony, multiple congressional sources tell NBC News.

The former Breitbart executive and now-spurned Trump confidante spent more than eight hours before the House Intelligence Committee Tuesday, the first of three high-profile witnesses expected before the panel this week.

Bannon, who joined Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in August of 2016, was expected to offer key testimony about potential contacts between Kremlin agents and entities working on behalf of the Republican candidate. But as one of the most senior White House officials to appear before the committee, he was also expected to be pressed by Democrats on multiple fronts, particularly interactions between transition officials and representatives of foreign governments, and discussions within the West Wing that led to the firing of FBI Director James Comey.

The House’s Russia probe has been bogged down by partisan infighting for weeks, including whether events that took place after Election Day are within the scope of inquiry and whether witnesses appearing voluntarily can be compelled to answer certain questions.

But there was rare bipartisan agreement Tuesday. When Bannon told lawmakers he was willing to answer questions about his time in the White House but the Trump administration had instructed him not to, the committee issued a subpoena on the spot to compel him to cooperate. Committee Chairman Devin Nunes confirmed to reporters that he signed off on the subpoena.

It was not immediately clear whether the White House was formally invoking executive privilege as the basis for instructing Bannon to cooperate.

“As with all congressional inquiries touching upon the White House, Congress must consult with the White House prior to obtaining confidential material,” Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said. “We have been fully cooperative with these ongoing investigations, and encourage the committees to work with us to find an appropriate accommodation in order to ensure Congress obtains information necessary to its legitimate interests.”

Rep. Tom Rooney of Florida, one of the three Republicans heading up the Russia probe, said the panel certainly would respect executive privilege, but that it was unclear of whether it would apply both to activities that occurred in the transition and in the White House.

“When does that attach is the question that’s sort of dominating the day,” he said. “If you are a part of the White House in any way, and you’re talking about things that were during the campaign … then what?

Democrats have complained multiple times that the Republican majority has been too willing to let witnesses ignore questions without citing sufficient basis. Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the panel, has cited Donald Trump Jr.’s claim of attorney-client privilege when he was asked to discuss conversations with his father about the 2016 Trump Tower meeting, and Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions implicit claim of executive privilege when discussing the Justice Department’s Russia probe.

Image: White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, right, listens as President Donald Trump speaks Image: White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, right, listens as President Donald Trump speaks

White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, right, listens as President Donald Trump speaks at the beginning of a meeting with government cyber security experts in the Roosevelt Room at the White House on Jan. 31, 2017 in Washington. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images file

“The majority’s unwillingness to subpoena these witnesses or insist on answers not only inhibits our ability to get to the truth but of equal consequence means that in the future, congressional investigations will be hamstrung because this will be cited as a precedent,” Schiff told reporters last week.

It would be significant if the stance taken by the committee Tuesday would apply to other witnesses expected to appear this week, including White House Communications Director Hope Hicks and former Trump aide Cory Lewandowski. Now the White House communications director, Hicks worked on the Trump campaign since the beginning and before it in the Trump Organization.

Bannon appeared before the committee just weeks after he was essentially exiled by the White House for comments in Michael Wolffe’s new book, “Fire & Fury,” saying Trump Jr. and other senior campaign aides’ willingness to meet with Russians in the summer of 2016 was potentially “treasonous” behavior.

As Bannon was behind closed doors at the Capitol Tuesday, the New York Times reported that the Justice Department investigation overseen by special counsel Robert Mueller issued its own subpoena for Bannon to appear before a grand jury.